منظمات المجتمع المدني السودانية تشترط «الحريات» للدخول في «الحوار»

اتدرون لماذا لا يرضى هذا النظام الهتلري من اعطاء الحريات التي تطالب بها تلكم المنظمات السبب بسيط لان كتم الحريات وجمهها هي ركن من اركان وجودهم مثله مثل ركن من اركان اي مبنى فاذا تمت ازالته فينهدم باقي الاركان والمبنى بالكامل …وهذا ما يخشاه هؤلاء الكلاب الضالة المدعوة بالكيزان ….غضب الله عنهم

المشكلة حتى المنظمات الان فى السودان مسيسة و هذا ان يراعى فى عمل المنظات التى هى الان تدعى الحرية و الانسانيةةةة و لذلك تمنع و تقنن لها الشروط مادام هى التى يفترض ييفترض عليها ادارة الحوار

The most paining thing in this country called Sudan is the conflicting roles of the civil society organizations, of which some are pure knowing what the word civil society organizations mean, when that are related to neutralism, deeply non-pro-government or pro-political affiliate bodies, to solely link themselves to the objectives, vision, mission and the goal set for them to play so as to change the life of the societies everywhere. Those and these major duties are lacked a great deal and that they are mostly not found there, within the Sudanese spectrums and here in the typically contaminated country by those and these huge differences called the Republic of Sudan, the differences which have penetrated the hearts of what the world most respected bodies and most trusted bodies to play roles of defending the rights of their people within the territories and outside the territories of the country (Sudan). That was sad times to experience through many reports which could not prove that they are really independent that they are have not had inherited any sort of affiliates or even that were there as un-avoidable matter within the structure of the country called Sudan, yet they can?t show that they are so strong to say no, even to the institutions of political dimensions they are belonging to or indirectly representing them in such a way. In fact all that does not mean there are not good and still strong individual civil societies organizations to rely on, yet the effect of that and within that Sudan much conflicting interests as proven to be meaningless, however hoping for the best to happen is not disqualified. To my knowledge the best of all that individual CSOs have not been left to work in the country to let their voice of the peoples? needs be heard at that level of making good progress and impact on such highest ceiling of peace talks and peace demands aims. The question remains to say what criteria can we adjust to justify how far those NGOs/ defined as none-state actors, which does not at all apply in Sudan, since long time ago. Participation on issues highly affecting the geo-political life of the Sudanese within these improper set of defending others rights, which the dictator regime of the Sudan had succeeded to establish it made the road to fairness of the civil society organizations in Sudan is completely questionable dilemma always. Those Islamists NCP and the associate organizations have had turned everything to 360? than whatever people might have before their coming as militant ruling system, just get the supporting mouths of I got what you have paid me and I am ready to sacrifice my dignity and credibility to back you in all cases my sincere government. This peace talks the civil society?s organizations are talking about as comprehensive needed dialogues for peace with the participation of the civil societies is not bad idea, which must be, but its imp actability of the impossibilities seen, to come about genuine position that comes from that differences within those affiliations we know them. Huge experiences refer strongly and confidently on those points to come across and finish up with them from those differences of conflicts of interests to the point of having very logic, acceptable and real problems that have made others to die for and displace themselves forcefully by millions after millions. Inclusivity is 35% beneficial to the sight of achieving the basic human needed peace reach in this case and it is 65% harming indeed, when we find that the platform to meet and make one direction of problems solutions to touch the real lives of the people on the target spots, then something of partiality appears unfortunately, un-avoidably and with un-predicted outcome. That definition of whom are the civil societies organization and what power through true independent wording to expose and make them eligible to come together whether they are (50) or (250) organization is very important first, before any admit ion of such important gathering roles. Otherwise, the voices have to be accepted and considered within the abled defenders of the people?s rights to take them on board, may be if selections are consultative manner is made then representation of such body will be seen either (2 or 5) as maximum attendance, not just for overbears but with that power of representing (7,000) civil society as quite enough not in quantification of things but qualifications of the objects and subjects to gain best fruit. Some areas which are meant by that peace talks have had been too much injured by that kind of the generalizations outlooks, not getting into the depth of their concerns at the end.

كلامكم جميل لن يتم هذا الا بعد تفكيك وتشتيت تلك العصابة السؤال هل لديهم اجندة معلنة يغلب عليها الطابع الرسمي وتنفذ ويكون عليها شهود دوليون اشك في ذلك انهم يحملون اجنده خفية لا يعلم بها الا الله وهم اذا كان الطابع التقليدي لهذا الحوار هو اجتماع مع رؤساء الاحزاب فقط وتبعد الحركات المسلحة واحزاب اليسار و ستخوض فى قضايا مصيرية وستصدر عنها قرارات بعيدا عن المغضوب عليهم اعتبرها لا قيمة لها ف لا مجال غير تفكيكهم صامولة صامولة وضمهم للاحزاب والمنظمات الارهابية هم لا دين ولا وعد ولاذمة لهم مجموعات تجمعها المصالح الاقتصادية الخاصة لا يجمعهم الاسلام اصلا كما يتوهمون ويخدعون به اتباعهم الغوغاء تفرقهم العصي والبندقية ولا اري غير تهديد مصالحهم الكراسي والاقتصاد بنوك وشركات ومزارع وغيره او المقاطعة للوثبات المجهولة

يا جماعة ملاحظين حاجه أنه حتى اليوم لم أقرأ تعليق حتى للذين يختلفون معنا أول شىء يقال أن ضد نظام الكيزان المعفن ثم يستعدل الواحد ويقبل علينا نحن ويتهمنا بأننا كيزان
البلد دى كلها مافيها راجل واحد يكتب اسمه وبريده اللإلكترونى ويقول انا كوز ونظامنا دا أحسن نظام ويمسك البيان بتاع ثورتهم ويحلله لينا كلمة كلمة ويقول قلنا فى 30 يونيو 89م كذا وسويناه قلنا كذا وسيوناه
عارفين جماعة الإنقاذ دى ما ناس حاره ودواس فكرى لقوا لهفه يلهفوها ويندسوا والله انا لو محل عمر البشير اسوق جيشى واخل بيتوهم واحد واحد من ترابيهم لا غبارهم اجردهم من كل شىء بس اخلى لى كل واحد سروال وعراقى وللمره فركه وتوب وبس والأطفال ميط وكله ادخله بيت المسلمين حتى بيت عبد الله اخوى وخالى بتاع الصيحة والإنتباهه
لا أخل فلو س لا دهب لا عيش لا دقيق ولو البيت دا بناه فى عهد الإنقاذ بعرفه من تصريح البناء اصادره منه ولو عنده مزرعه دواجن او خراف أو بقر أو مزارع نخيل فى الشمالية ونهر النيل وغيرها تصادر كل شىء فى السودان دا يؤول للدولة حتى مزرعة عمر نفسه وبيته ويرجع كوبر تانى
والله لا تحتاج تشحت من تميم لا تحتاج لتحويلات عمله خارجية العملة الصعبة البتلقاها فى بيوت ناس قطبى تغني وطنك السودان لى يوم القيامة لكن العنده همه منو