الحركة الشعبية لتحرير السودان تكون لجنة لتلخيص المناقشات والمقترحات حول الدستور الانتقالى 2013

This is how evaluating your deeds comes from other faithful supporting element to technically sensitized and make best of the needed re-reading and re-writing improvements in the constitutions.
Once the committee is formed though I personally expected to see some very professional and committed names here form SPLM legal figures but they are not seen here, which means a confession that the constitution was done in in a professional way. But when people and their leaders accept to confess that there are many mistakes are taken technically then it is a good spirit, yet these are not enough and are not quite needed to add some professional figures in terms of law making background. Building a nation of inclusive and strong constitutional establishment needs not only to look for those leaders think they the best dedicated and loyal cadre, but also to include those who know better and can constructively make something that will last for years and years as a law reference to the nation not only to the specific part confined thinking. It is a constitution of the country not of the single entity although that entity is a leading core master to that. SPLM in general and among them some are also good lawyers, being judges, scholar, civil society organizations activists and politicians whose ideas are complementary to all, in that diversified form has made it clear every good steps need time and more evaluation measures, popular support through that attainment of the voices to add in systematic and organizational manner within SPLM structure to constructively make things more improved and future undertaken and correct making of a lasting constitution, not for Malik, Abdul Aziz and Yasser Saeed Arman, who I think and observed long time ago is reflecting evenly in his manner of administering things within his competence scaling, but it will last for the remained 31,000 million not the Sudanese people in general. Continual suspects and treating what could be useful in that manner, bring such results of realizing mistakes but in too late time, if that time could be something else to be applied for other issue of high danger to human life for example then individual final decision making concerns will be a disastrous not a relief matter. Congratulations for this quality of accepting to review and confess that what was prepared and passed by the council was not connect, here is a good understanding and roles sharing start, but let that be more fruitful as far as you have heard that voices of rejection and taken not of and action to correct. This my own impetuous frankness and willingness that do things in better ways.
Thank you

Long live SPLA/N and victory is ours